Oh, sorry... at work I got 3.8.1, I mixed this up. I thought that I had there similar behavior (not the error message)... I will check again.

Best Regards!
Fabian

On 01/24/2011 09:45 PM, pat marion wrote:
You are using 3.8.0, not 3.8.1.  If you use 3.8.1 to generate the trace
script you will not receive these errors.


Your script can also be fixed by hand-  editing test_trace.py and move
the lines at the very bottom modifying Slice1, Slice2 and Slice3.
Moving the lines up so they appear after the constructors of Slice1,
Slice2, and Slice3.

Pat

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Fabian Braennstroem
<f.braennstr...@gmx.de <mailto:f.braennstr...@gmx.de>> wrote:

    Hi,

    thanks. I get this error message:


    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<string>", line 382, in <module>
      File
    
"/home/gcae504/HOME/Dissertation/simulation_calc/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-1.7.x/platforms/linux64Gcc/paraview-3.8.0/lib/paraview-3.8/paraview/servermanager.py",
    line 201, in __setattr__
    "to add this attribute.")
    AttributeError: Attribute SelectedMapperIndex does not exist.  This
    class does not allow addition of new attributes to avoid mistakes
    due to typos. Use add_attribute() if you really want to add this
    attribute.

    I attached two pictures (test.png is the one create manually and
    test2.png the one create with the script) and the script. Thanks for
    your help!

    Best Regards!
    Fabian


    On 01/24/2011 08:57 PM, pat marion wrote:

        Hi Fabian,

        Regarding your issue of python trace state not replicating your
        paraview
        state exactly, I believe both issues you quote (camera position
        and cut
        filter's slice property) have been addressed in the latest
        version of
        paraview.  If not, can you list the steps required to repeat the
        problem?  I can't find bug reports for these issues, but below I
        have
        copied the git logs for the commits the addressed the issues.

        Pat

        commit f3f73df79fe4ca377297885c4c71bcba661b165d
        Author: Pat Marion <pat.mar...@kitware.com
        <mailto:pat.mar...@kitware.com> <mailto:pat.mar...@kitware.com
        <mailto:pat.mar...@kitware.com>>>

        Date:   Tue May 18 14:50:17 2010 -0400

             BUG: Add method to disable the first render ResetCamera.

             Added python method
        paraview.simple._DisableFirstRenderResetCamera()
             and included it at the top of all generated trace scripts.
          This is
             tested by PythonSMTraceTest1 since I removed the extra
        'Render()'
             call from the test which was there to work around the issue.

        commit d9119f6be4b10b97b18fc2a2d5232788363d3fc9
        Author: Pat Marion <pat.mar...@kitware.com
        <mailto:pat.mar...@kitware.com> <mailto:pat.mar...@kitware.com
        <mailto:pat.mar...@kitware.com>>>

        Date:   Fri Apr 30 13:35:03 2010 -0400

             BUG: Group helper proxies with the proxy using the helper.

             For example, now 'my_slice.SliceType.Normal' is mapped to
        my_slice
             instead of the SliceType helper proxy.  Now when you trace
        state,
             the helper proxy's properties are grouped with the parent
        proxy.
             Previously all helper proxy properties were listed at the very
             end of the trace, and that was incorrect.


        On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Fabian Braennstroem
        <f.braennstr...@gmx.de <mailto:f.braennstr...@gmx.de>
        <mailto:f.braennstr...@gmx.de <mailto:f.braennstr...@gmx.de>>>
        wrote:

            Hello,

            thanks for the info!
            Is my impression correct, that in version 3.8.1 the python trace
            state process is not as 'complete' as using the old state
        file approach?
            For my case setup, e.g. there is not always the correct camera
            position and the correct slices...

            Best Regards!
            Fabian


            On 01/24/2011 08:13 PM, David E DeMarle wrote:

                That page is ancient.

                I think PVFWrap was the predecessor to paraview.simple which
                since 3.6
                is the standard way to do ParaView python scripting (see
        python
                trace).
                The comments about paraview state files being too
        verbose have been
                addressed since then as well.

                Or did you mean something else?

                David E DeMarle
                Kitware, Inc.
                R&D Engineer
                28 Corporate Drive
                Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
                Phone: 518-371-3971 x109



                On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Fabian Braennstroem
        <f.braennstr...@gmx.de <mailto:f.braennstr...@gmx.de>
        <mailto:f.braennstr...@gmx.de <mailto:f.braennstr...@gmx.de>>>
          wrote:


                    Hi,

                    I just found this page and wonder, if this will be a new
                    approach for python
                    scripting:

        
http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/index.php/Visualization_Script_Examples#Paraview_Python_Script_with_PVFWrap

                    In addition, there are comments about the VisIt
        way... do
                    you plan something
                    like this!?

                    Best Regards!
                    Fabian
                    _______________________________________________
                    Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
        <http://www.kitware.com>


                    Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
        http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

                    Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView
        Wiki at:
        http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

                    Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
        http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


            _______________________________________________
            Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
        <http://www.kitware.com>


            Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
        http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

            Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
        http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

            Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
        http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview





_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to