My Experience with Mesa 7.7(?) and 7.8 was that there was some major bug
where you could only set the MakeCurrent on the gl context more than once.

http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=10900

http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=11163


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Fabian, Nathan <ndfa...@sandia.gov> wrote:

>  Yep.  7.9 works great.  I’ve used 7.8.2 with 3.8.x.  Is Mesa something
> people should expect to upgrade going to paraview 3.10?
>
>
> On 2/15/11 2:40 PM, "David Partyka" <david.part...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
> Use an older (7.6?) or newer mesa (7.9).
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Fabian, Nathan <ndfa...@sandia.gov>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've built a recent pull of the master branch against Mesa-7.8.2. I'm
> building pure Offscreen with no X or GL.  When I try to render I get the
> following fatal error:
>
> main/renderbuffer.c:1924: _mesa_add_renderbuffer: Assertion `bufferName ==
> BUFFER_DEPTH || bufferName == BUFFER_STENCIL ||
> fb->Attachment[bufferName].Renderbuffer == ((void *)0)' failed.
>
> I get this in my own coprocessing app, but I also tested pvserver connected
> via client elsewhere and got the same error when the render started.  When
> I
> build with GL both apps work fine.
>
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to