I am currently using 3.10...but since clusters in my office have 3.6.2 installed i tried to use that version. However, for this file:

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE Xdmf SYSTEM "Xdmf.dtd" []>
<Xdmf>
   <Domain Name="test.xdmf">
               <Grid Name="TensGrid">
<Topology TopologyType="2DSMesh" Dimensions = "256 256 ">
                   </Topology>
                   <Geometry GeometryType="X_Y">
<DataItem Dimensions="256 256" NumberType="Float" Precision="8" Format="HDF">
                               Q.h5:/X
                           </DataItem>
<DataItem Dimensions="256 256 " NumberType="Float" Precision="8" Format="HDF">
                               Q.h5:/Y
                           </DataItem>
                   </Geometry>
<Attribute Name="S" Center="Node" AttributeType="Scalar" Precision="8"> <DataItem Format="HDF" Center="Node" NumberType="Float" Dimensions="256 256" Precision="8">
                           Q.h5:/S
                       </DataItem>
                   </Attribute>
<Attribute Name="sig" Center="Node" AttributeType="Tensor" Precision="8"> <DataItem Format="HDF" NumberType="Float" Dimensions="256 256 8" Precision="8">
                           Q.h5:/Q
                       </DataItem>
</Attribute> </Grid>
   </Domain>
</Xdmf>
....a simple xdmf for reading data, paraview 3.6 gives an error:

ERROR: In /home/pratik/Manually_Installed_Softwares/numerical/ParaView/ParaView-3.6.2/VTK/Filtering/vtkDataSet.cxx, line 406

vtkStructuredGrid (0xb091888): Point array sig with 9 components, only has 14563 tuples but there are 65536 points


whereas 3.10 does not.
Was there a different format for reading xdmf files in pv3.6? I did try playing around with the dimensions, but it still didn't work.
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to