Generally the best place to ask questions is the ParaView mailing list 
(paraview@paraview.org).

To quickly answer your question, the data partitioning is usually chosen by the 
reader.  The ParaView/VTK system simply asks the reader to load piece i of n, 
where i is generally set to the rank of the MPI process.

Things are different for structured grids (i.e. uniform, rectilinear, and 
curvilinear grids).  It's more complicated due to the way VTK handles these 
type of extents.

-Ken

From: Thomas Fronk <fr...@mit.edu<mailto:fr...@mit.edu>>
Date: Wednesday, November 7, 2012 11:11 AM
To: Kenneth Moreland <kmo...@sandia.gov<mailto:kmo...@sandia.gov>>, Kenneth 
Moreland <bnwy...@sandia.gov<mailto:bnwy...@sandia.gov>>, 
"dhrog...@sandia.gov<mailto:dhrog...@sandia.gov>" 
<dhrog...@sandia.gov<mailto:dhrog...@sandia.gov>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] ParaView Research Project

Hello,

My name is Thomas Fronk and I am a senior at Massachusetts Institute of 
Technology (MIT). I am currently working on a research project concerning 
ParaView for the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN). I am unsure if I 
have the correct contact information with regards to ParaView advice/support 
and I apologize in advance for any inconveniences.

I have a question about the way ParaView partitions data on multiple nodes. It 
seems to partition the data automatically without the user having any control.

To give you some background, my research project is to determine whether it is 
possible to optimize processing time through pre-splitting up a large data set. 
We want to tell ParaView how to split up a large data set unto multiple nodes 
and then run ParaView in parallel (reverse client/server mode) telling it that 
it should use those specific nodes. The goal is to have the individual nodes 
perform their calculation and rendering  with the local data fragment that was 
previously stored there, thus avoiding additional delays caused by the nodes 
having to access the head node where the entire data is stored.

Is this possible? Is there a way to mandate which nodes to use and how ParaView 
should split up the data among the nodes? Also, can ParaView tell the 
individual nodes to work with the locally stored data fragment instead of 
accessing the whole data set at the head node?

Thank you very much for your help and I look forward to hearing from you.

Best Regards,
Thomas

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to