Hi, Christian, It seems just adding back the XML description is enough to fix this. Can you verify by applying the attached patch and see if it works for you? ( cd to your ParaView source dir, and run "git apply add-particle-path.diff" ).
Note that, to differentiate from the new stuff, I have changed the filter name from "Particle Pathlines" --> "Temporal Particles To Pathlines". thanks, Leo On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Christian Richter < christian.rich...@ovgu.de> wrote: > Hi Leo, > > I attached you the simplest testcase I can made, one STL and one vtk > containing only one particle. > At the image you see the expected output as it was in 3.14.1. > > Thanks for fixis this, > Christian > > Am 06.12.2012 16:50, schrieb Yuanxin Liu: > > Hi, Christian, > We can the filter back (probably under a different name). Do you mind > sending me the data file you have? > thanks! > Leo > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Christian Richter < > christian.rich...@ovgu.de> wrote: > >> Hi Leo, >> >> thanks for your answer. >> My Problem is, I only have particle data (Position at dumptime, velocity >> at dumptime) and no vector field (result of a simple DEM-Simulation). >> >> I read your article and played arround with TerminationTime and the >> Animation Panel but I found no solution. And because the old filter works >> well the c&p solution is the best for my case. I would like to ask if we >> could have both filter in PV 4 - the best filter for each special case. >> >> Thanks, >> Christian >> >> Am 05.12.2012 21:05, schrieb Yuanxin Liu: >> >> Hi, Christian, >> >> The old ParticlePathLine filter is replaced by ParticlePath filter. >> Unlike the old one, you do not have to attach it to a particle tracer. >> Also make sure you set the "TerminationTime" parameter to the largest >> possible time. >> >> I have written an article about this work: . >> http://www.kitware.com/source/home/post/76 >> >> Let me know if this works for you. >> >> thanks, >> >> Leo >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Christian Richter < >> christian.rich...@ovgu.de> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> in Paraview 3.98 the ParticlePathLines Filter is gone away. We use this >>> to show the trajectory of simple particle data (x,y,z), based on ID. Is >>> this intended ? >>> >>> I got it back by copy & paste the proxysource from filter.xml in 3.14 >>> (line 6679++) to 3.98. Would it be possible to add back the old >>> ParticlePathlines Filter (with single inputsource and Pathline & Particle >>> as output) in 3.98 because I love the webGL scene export in the new >>> Paraview. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Christian >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>> >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >>> >> >> >> > >
add-particle-path.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
