Hi Mark, I just added the following:
------------------ list(APPEND PARAVIEW_OPTIONS "-DMPI_Fortran_COMPILER:FILEPATH=/opt/cray/xt-asyncpe/5.17/bin/ftn") list(APPEND PARAVIEW_OPTIONS "-DMPI_Fortran_INCLUDE_PATH:FILEPATH=/opt/cray/mpt/5.6.3/gni/mpich2-gnu/47/include") list(APPEND PARAVIEW_OPTIONS "-DMPI_Fortran_LIBRARIES:FILEPATH=/opt/cray/mpt/5.6.3/gni/mpich2-gnu/47/lib/libfmpich.a;/opt/cray/mpt/5.6.3/gni/mpich2-gnu/47/lib/libmpichf90.a") ------------------ While looking into the CMakeError.log, I found there are a few related undefined reference errors during the final linking stages when linking FortranCInterface, hence FortranCInterface got dropped in both tools and cross stages. I am trying to play with some options and rebuilt everything. By the way, have you been able to successfully superbuild paraview with FortranCInterface/FortranCMangling built also successfully on Titan? If so, could you share what additional options you have added into ParaViewDefaults.cmake to have them build successfully? Thanks, Hong ________________________________________ From: Vanmoer, Mark W [mvanm...@illinois.edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:34 AM To: Hong Yi; paraview@paraview.org Subject: RE: [Paraview] Errors when linking catalyst in ParaView version 4.0.1 to, simulation code on Titan (Hong Yi) Hi Hong, Can you share all of the CMake variables regarding Fortran and Phasta Coprocessing you might have hand set during the superbuild process? I'm trying to compare to a successful non-superbuild Fortran copro install on my workstation. Thanks, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [mailto:paraview- > boun...@paraview.org] On Behalf Of Hong Yi > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 12:06 PM > To: Benson Muite; paraview@paraview.org > Subject: Re: [Paraview] Errors when linking catalyst in ParaView version 4.0.1 > to, simulation code on Titan (Hong Yi) > > Thanks for the useful info, Benson. I did what you suggested and now > superbuild can find MPI_FORTRAN. However, > FortranCInterface_GLOBAL_FOUND variable is zero, so I still got the warning > "No FortranCInterface mangling known for coprocessorinitialize" during the > build. Did you get that error also? I have not found where > FortranCInterface_GLOBAL_FOUND variable is set in CMake yet, so have no > exact clue on why this variable is zero (i.e., why FortranCInterface_GLOBAL is > not found). Have to dig in deeper to see what else I need to set for > superbuild to find FortranCInterface, but let me know if you or anybody else > in the list have some suggestions on what to look for to resolve this issue. > > Thanks and regards, > > Hong > ________________________________________ > From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] > on behalf of Benson Muite [benson_mu...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 4:55 AM > To: paraview@paraview.org > Subject: Re: [Paraview] Errors when linking catalyst in ParaView version 4.0.1 > to, simulation code on Titan (Hong Yi) > > Hi Hong Yi, > > I got a similar error. One way to is to find the paths for the mpi libraries > on > titan directly - do module show cray_mpich for the mpich version in your gcc > environment. When you run ccmake, toggle to the advanced configuration > and enter the paths directly. You will need to manually add all the statically > linked libraries. To put in more than one library on the same line, you will > need to separate the paths by semicolons. > > Regards, > Benson > > On 07/09/2013 09:08, paraview-requ...@paraview.org wrote: > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:27:23 +0000 > > From: Hong Yi <hon...@renci.org> > > Subject: Re: [Paraview] Errors when linking catalyst in ParaView > > version 4.0.1 to simulation code on Titan > > To: David E DeMarle <dave.dema...@kitware.com>, Andy Bauer > > <andy.ba...@kitware.com> > > Cc: "paraview@paraview.org" <paraview@paraview.org> > > Message-ID: > > > > <65F8B323A072504ABFC5D3D8751910514FEB3E51@MAIL- > MBX2.ad.renci.org> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > > > Hi Andy, David, > > > > I used GCC to build both ParaView and simulation code. The problem is > with ParaView's superbuild not being able to find MPI_Fortran on Titan. I got > the following messages during superbuild: > > > > -------------- > > Could NOT find MPI_Fortran (missing: MPI_Fortran_LIBRARIES > > MPI_Fortran_INCLUDE_PATH) > > > > No FortranCInterface mangling known for coprocessorinitialize > > > > ... > > > > -------------- > > > > I then tried to add "ftn" into FindMPI.cmake, but got the message "Unable > to determine MPI from MPI driver /opt/cray/xt-asyncpe/5.17/bin/ftn" prior > to those MPI_Fortran errors. I looked at ftn wrapper but could not > determine the mpi Fortran executable, either. Let me know if you have ideas > on how to make superbuild to find MPI_Fortran. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Hong > > > > ________________________________ > > From: David E DeMarle [dave.dema...@kitware.com] > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:21 PM > > To: Andy Bauer > > Cc: Hong Yi; paraview@paraview.org > > Subject: Re: [Paraview] Errors when linking catalyst in ParaView > > version 4.0.1 to simulation code on Titan > > > > The Superbuild on cray uses the backend flavor of the GCC compiler > (xk7_gcc target). I haven't made an xk7_pgi target yet. > > > > David E DeMarle > > Kitware, Inc. > > R&D Engineer > > 21 Corporate Drive > > Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 > > Phone: 518-881-4909 > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Andy Bauer > <andy.ba...@kitware.com<mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com>> wrote: > > Hi Hong, > > > > This Fortran/C mangling issue is a bit tricky. It has to be done during the > configuration process because the C and Fortran compilers won't necessarily > know how to properly mangle the function names. The thing is that it the > configuration process depends on using the same compilers as any other > code that links to the generated libraries. You can check out Bill Hoffman's > blog at http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/231 which explains this > issue and how CMake handles it. Now if ParaView Catalyst was built with GCC > and you built your simulation code with PGI, for example, then it wouldn't > surprise me that this issue crops up. What compilers did you use for your > ParaView build and your simulation code build? If they are consistent then it > is a problem with CMake or ParaView's superbuild. > > > > Regards, > > Andy > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Hong Yi > <hon...@renci.org<mailto:hon...@renci.org>> wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > > Thanks for the useful info. You are exactly right ? the problem is caused by > C/Fortran mangling of the names. In the Fortran code, underbar trailing is not > there for all catalyst-related function calls, those underbar trailing to the > function names as shown in the linking errors are automatically added by > C/Fortran mangling in the final linking stage. I also pulled in the Fortran > example in the github repo, and got the similar undefined reference errors in > the final linking stage when linking to the ParaView 4.0 built with > superbuild. > So the linking problem seems to be generic to Fortran code linking to > Catalyst. > > > > I checked the Catalyst static lib built with superbuild and found the lib > > only > includes function symbols without the trailing underbar such as > coprocessorinitialize, which explains why those undefined reference errors > result. I also tried to build ParaView 3.98 with superbuild which included > FortranAdaptor lib, and found the FortranAdatpor lib built with superbuild > does not include the trailing underbar for coprocessor-related functions, > while the FortranAdaptor lib built from source does include the trailing > underbar, which explains why I can link our simulation code to Catalyst 3.98 > built from source, but cannot successfully link to Catalyst 3.98 built with > superbuild. So here is my question: > > > > Should Catalyst libs built with superbuild contain those coprocessing > function symbols with trailing underbar in addition to those corresponding > function symbols without trailing underbar? Specifically, for example, I am > wondering whether both coprocessorinitialize and coprocessorinitialize_ > need to present so these coprocessing functions can be called from different > languages including Fortran? Could you confirm whether this is the case? If > so, I need to check my superbuild to see why those trailing underbar > functions are not created in the Catalyst libs. Let me know if you, David, or > anybody else can confirm whether this is the case, or offer any > ideas/suggestions. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hong > > > > > > From: Andy Bauer > > [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com<mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com>] > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 12:33 PM > > To: Hong Yi > > Cc: paraview@paraview.org<mailto:paraview@paraview.org> > > Subject: Re: [Paraview] Errors when linking catalyst in ParaView > > version 4.0.1 to simulation code on Titan > > > > Hi Hong, > > > > I think it's the Fortran mangling of the names. Try taking out the > > underscore > on the Fortran subroutine calls. Let me know if that doesn't help. Otherwise > it may be an issue with how C/Fortran mangles things. The GCC behavior > should be the following: > > Fortran -> call xyz() > > C -> void xyz_() {...}. > > All of these methods should be available in the vtkPVCatalyst module. If > you can't get it to work, try to see what you can do with the Fortran example > in the github repo. > > > > Regards, > > And > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Hong Yi > <hon...@renci.org<mailto:hon...@renci.org>> wrote: > > When linking our simulation code (a variant of phasta) to Catalyst in > ParaView version 4.0.1 built on Titan with superbuild, I got the following > linking errors: > > > > ----------------- > > ../../lib/libincompressible.a(itrdrv.f.o): In function `itrdrv_': > > itrdrv.f:(.text+0x2add): undefined reference to `coprocessorinitialize_' > > itrdrv.f:(.text+0x6198): undefined reference to `coprocessorfinalize_' > > itrdrv.f:(.text+0x973d): undefined reference to `coprocessorfinalize_' > > ../../lib/libincompressible.a(phastaadaptor.f.o): In function > `phastacoprocessor_': > > phastaadaptor.f:(.text+0x84): undefined reference to > `requestdatadescription_' > > phastaadaptor.f:(.text+0x95): undefined reference to `needtocreategrid_' > > phastaadaptor.f:(.text+0xba): undefined reference to `coprocess_' > > /usr/bin/ld: link errors found, deleting executable `../../bin/phastaIC.exe' > > ----------------- > > > > I use CMake to link Catalyst to our simulation code. I was able to resolve > those linking errors when linking to ParaView version 3.98.1 by adding > "find_package(ParaView 3.98 REQUIRED COMPONENTS FortranAdaptor)" in > addition to find_package for vtkCoProcessorImplementation and then link > both to the final executable. However, for ParaView version 4.0.1, it seems > FortranAdaptor does not exist any more which defines those functions such > as coprocessorinitialize, etc. Here is the corresponding excerpt in my > CMakeLists.txt related to linking Catalyst in ParaView version 4.0.1: > > ------------------- > > if(USE_CATALYST) > > find_package(ParaView 3.98 REQUIRED COMPONENTS > vtkPVPythonCatalyst) > > find_library(PHASTA_ADAPTOR_LIB PhastaAdaptorLib) > > include("${PARAVIEW_USE_FILE}") > > set(Adaptor_SRCS phastaadaptor.f) > > add_library(Adaptor ${Adaptor_SRCS}) > > target_link_libraries(Adaptor ${PHASTA_ADAPTOR_LIB} > vtkPVPythonCatalyst) > > add_definitions("-DUSE_CATALYST") > > endif() > > ------------------- > > > > Adaptor is then linked to the final executable. > > > > Please let me know if you have ideas on what I should do to resolve those > linking errors. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Hong > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com> > > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
