Philipp, I can confirm what you see with a pre 4.2 version of ParaView. However, the number of produced cells is the same.
I will try to track down why this changed. Thanks, Cory On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Philipp E <pspeac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Cory > > I managed to compress the data set to a fair size and attached it to > this mail. The data set is pressure, contour value is 0.55. > > By looking again at the data (contour -> information), I just found that > the old version (3.14.1) uses 148432 cells , while the the new one > employs 75232 cells. Hope that helps. > > Kind regards > Philipp > > Errata: I meant 4.2.0RC1 in the previous mails. > > On 09/19/2014 04:59 PM, Cory Quammen wrote: >> Phillipp, >> >> Do you have a data set similar to the one you've shown that you can share? >> >> Thanks, >> Cory >> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Philipp E <pspeac...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Cory, >>> >>> thank you for your fast feedback. >>> >>> a) Compute normal is checked. (Without normals, the contour is >>> completely stepped) >>> b) Contour values are the same. >>> >>> Regards >>> Philipp >>> >>> On 09/19/2014 04:40 PM, Cory Quammen wrote: >>>> Philipp, >>>> >>>> In the contour filter, is the option "Compute Normals" checked in 4.0 RC1? >>>> >>>> Also, are the contour values the same between the two versions? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Cory >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Philipp E <pspeac...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> after extensive search I was desperate enough to post on this list: >>>>> >>>>> It appears that the surface smoothing algorithm of the contour filter >>>>> does not work as "aggressive" as in older version (3.14.1 was the last >>>>> one we found to do so). As an example I prepared this two screenshots, >>>>> VTK data are scalars on a structured grid (200x100x100), legacy format. >>>>> (An additional call of the "smooth" filter does not help.) >>>>> >>>>> 3.14.1 >>>>> http://s7.directupload.net/images/140919/euadfvko.png >>>>> 4.0.RC1 >>>>> http://s14.directupload.net/images/140919/84y689mi.png >>>>> >>>>> Both versions are running with the shipped settings. Since the effect >>>>> could be reproduced on several workstations, we are wondering whether >>>>> there has been an (undocumented?) change in the filter mechanism or some >>>>> option we/setting/data problem we are not aware of. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards and thanks in advance >>>>> Philipp Engels. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>>>> >>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>>>> >>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>>>> >>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview