Thanks, I see from Ken's comment that my problem is a changing topology. Some of the nodes in the grid will become active over time... I've tried sectioning away the regions that become active, but this didn't work... Is there a better way to get around topology change for this filter?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Scott, W Alan <wasc...@sandia.gov> wrote: > I stand corrected. Thanks for the feedback. > > Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Thompson [mailto:david.thomp...@kitware.com] > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 11:15 AM > To: Scott, W Alan > Cc: Moreland, Kenneth; David E DeMarle; timcfagan .; paraview@paraview.org > Subject: Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Re: temporal threshold > > > You may be right. I am just dredging up old memories from a few years > ago. David Thompson should remember – he helped write the filter. David? > > I am sure that at one point it worked in parallel, with the caveat that > samples of points or point-data will over-represent values on process > boundaries (because ParaView does not have knowledge of how many processes > hold any given process-boundary point). > > Err, and as I see Ken just mentioned, I only worked on the statistics > filters that Temporal Statistics uses under the hood. > > David >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
