Hello,
I managed to reproduce the problem. The difference between ParaView
4.3.1 and previous version
comes to the removal of vtkPVTrivialExtentTranslator in the pipeline.
Thus, the update extent requested by the extract filter may not be
updated correctly anymore.
It is a similar problem to this other bug:
http://marc.info/?l=paraview&m=142168609529307&w=2
Best Regards
Mickael
On 20/03/2015 16:26, Etienne Tang wrote:
Hello,
I'm working with a 3D structured dataset containing cell data. I tried
to extract a 2D boundary of this dataset corresponding to the maximum
index of a dimension with the Extract Subset filter and ParaView 4.3.1,
and I found an issue: the resulting dataset is incorrect. It holds cell
data from the opposite boundary (eg. if I try to extract the i = imax
boundary, I get values from i = 0 boundary), and these values are
shifted of one index in the other dimensions.
This case worked with ParaView 4.1.0, maybe it is related to this other
bug about structured data :
http://markmail.org/message/fvatgidqbvnufgi6#query:+page:1+mid:fvatgidqbvnufgi6+state:results
?
Here are some pictures showing the problem on a simple dataset which can
be used to reproduce it:
- The simple .vts file : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/test.vts
- The original dataset : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/original_dataset.png
- The result of the ExtractSubset filter to extract the i = imax
boundary : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/extract_subset.png
Best regards,
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
