Hi All, I have worked with one of the IT persons to finally be able to use the capabilities of ParaView to capture a high resolution image of each time step at the end of my model run on a supercomputer. The problem that I am seeing is that Llvm is taking quite some time per rendered image. I currently only have 1 node with 8 cores that I use to my disposal. I run the script using pvbatch and the xmf read to get like 10 images in 10 minutes.
I am asking my IT guy to try and redo the compile so that it enables MPI so I can take advantage of multiple cores. Has any one else tried using Llvm with pvbatch to save out an image per time step? I saw the graph here - http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/ParaView_And_Mesa_3D - that talks about having 8 - 10 cores seems to be efficient. Would it make sense to span Llvm across mutlple nodes / would it be quicker? Thanks for any input - I am just a little confused on how pvbatch would work between multiple nodes / what command to use. Thanks, Noah
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
