On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 14:36:53 -0500, Cory Quammen wrote: > Thanks for the report. I looked into this and I think I know what is going on. > > In ParaView 5.2.0, we reduced the number of Python modules that > shipped with the ParaView binaries. One of the modules not included > was the "compiler" module. Now, Numpy checks to see if the "compiler" > module is available, and if it isn't, uses the "ast" module instead to > parse some file header data. However, Numpy doesn't correctly handle > the results produced by using ast.parse to parse the header data. > > ParaView 5.1.2 shipped with the "compiler" module, which is why it > worked for you in the past. We'll have to add it back for the next > release. I've added an issue to track here: > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/issues/43
Sorry about that, I missed the packages (foo/__init__.py) from the standard distribution. The nightlies will have it next week at the latest. --Ben _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
