On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Andrew Whitworth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Will Coleda <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is the unanswered question for me: What are you planning on >> calling the 5 releases between 1.0 and 1.5, if we're avoiding magic >> numbers aside from the milestone releases? > > Great point (although I think it's a little bit mis-timed). If 1.5 is > released in July (?) then there will 4 releases between 1.0 and 1.5. A > question on my mind is "What happens if we have 5 relatively major > additions/updates/improvements land in each consecutive release > between 1.5 and 2.0?" If we stick with the system we've been using to > differentiate between major/minor monthly updates, then we would need > to fudge the numbers in this scenario. > > And I hope the answer to the question above is not "Let's just hope we > never get so lucky". > > --Andrew Whitworth >
The releases are, as I understand it, timed every six months. My July comment was based on starting on the calendar year; I misspoke. If the milestone release is every six month, there are five releases between milestones, regardless of the month they actually occur in. -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
