chromatic wrote: > March 2009: Budgie 1 > Budgie 2 > Budgie 3 > Budgie 4 > July 2009 Cockatoo 1 > Cockatoo 2 > Cockatoo 3 > Cockatoo 4 > Cockatoo 5 > Cockatoo 6 > January 2010 Dusky 1 > > .... > > This scheme takes advantage of the biannual nature of our cycles, better > indicates the types of changes that the users Todd Olson mentions can expect, > and has the advantage of not throwing a stream of numbers such as 20090417 at > people.
+1. Though I don't have a problem with 20090417 either. Both of those make more sense to me than X.Y.Z does. Mark _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
