On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:29:02PM -0800, chromatic wrote: > Allison and I talked about that. It seems to me that we might as well put > likely removal dates (in terms of "GONE BY AUGUST 2009") in our deprecation > notices for the sake of clarity anyway, so we might as well keep our > numbering > scheme very boring and very predictable.
I'd prefer "GONE AFTER AUGUST 2009" to "GONE BY AUGUST 2009". Normally "deprecation" indicates we plan to remove something after a certain date (or "not before" a certain date). But yes, +1 from me on the overall plan. Pm _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
