I'm not against creating ops like this, but I would suggest instead creating them as dynops. In fact, I would be happy to see all the trig and hyperbolic trig ops moved to dynops, if they aren't already.
--Andrew Whitworth On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Peter Lobsinger <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 to adding such features to core without any prior demand from users > (none that I've heard anyways). > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> We have a full compliment of trig, inverse trig, and hyperbolic operations, >> except for: >> >> acot >> coth >> acsc >> csch >> >> We are also missing the inverse hyperbolic operations: >> >> asinh >> acosh >> atanh >> acoth >> asech >> acsch >> >> Should we provide any of these? If so, what about the ones that are complex >> over some range of arguments? >> >> ~~ Paul >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Windfall Paul C. Anagnostopoulos >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Software 978 371-2316 >> www.windfall.com >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Metaphorical invocations ... often suffer from the >> weakness of giving such satisfaction to the human >> mind that they tend to be mistaken for incisive and >> illuminating observations. ---Torkel Franzen >> _______________________________________________ >> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev > _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
