At the developer meeting today, one of the topics we covered was a new way of structuring the how we Parrot developers work as a group. I've gotten a rough consensus from those who were present at the meeting and put it up on the wiki at ParrotTeams, which is copy/pasted below. This is a pretty radical change from the current approach, but we also think it will be a significant improvement in our process and and in improving our bus numbers. We'll be discussing this further at the next #parrotsketch, so please attend if you have any questions or can suggest any improvements.

Thanks,
Christoph

Copy/paste from the wiki:

How teams work ¶

Participation ¶

Each team will have one person who has primary responsibility for that team. Any interested people are strongly encouraged to participate in any team, but the team lead will have final say over membership. Developers in a team other than the lead are referred to as team members. A team consisting of a single member is fine, but we love having high bus numbers.

Team Leads ¶

A team must consist of at least one member, who is the team lead. Team leads are required to commit to performing their duties for a period of 6 months at a time, with a brief review and request for renewal being performed at the #parrotsketch meeting before the x.0 and x.6 releases.

Qualifications ¶
Team membership is a formalization of a developer's prior actions. A developer wants to join a team, the procedure is to talk to the team lead and start contributing to that team's goals. Once a developer proves capable of working with the team and the community, the team lead will add that developer to that team. Team membership is documented on the wiki on TeamMemberships (TODO).

Disqualification ¶
Maintaining team membership and team membership documentation the responsibility of the team lead. A team lead may be ejected by a unanimous vote of the Parrot Foundation board of directors. The reason for ejection is at the discretion of the board of directors, but the primary criteria is that the lead is unable or unwilling to carry out the team's responsibilities.

Teams and Responsibilities ¶

Architecture ¶
This team is responsible for the overall vision and direction of Parrot. Their job is to determine where Parrot needs to go, keeping an eye toward the future. They have the final say in disagreements between the Project Management Team and the Product Management Team.

Project Management ¶
This team is responsible for taking the Architecture Team's vision and allocating resources with the aim of reaching that goal on an immediate, practical level.

Community Management ¶
This team acts as the face of Parrot to other communities. They are responsible for attracting new developers to Parrot, directing interested developers toward places where their interests and skills can be put to effective use. They also serve as and advocate for current Parrot developers.

Product Management ¶
This team is responsible for the vision of Parrot as a user-facing product. They also act as an advocate for the needs of Parrot's users (e.g. HLLs and libraries such as Rakudo and Kakapo), and as an interface between Parrot and its users.

QA Management ¶
This team is responsible for ensuring that we have good documentation and test coverage, that existing tests are run regularly and that tests are added for new features and bug fixes. This team may not be distinct from Project Management, but it is a distinct and vital responsibility.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev

Reply via email to