On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Peter Lobsinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> The hit assertion is for sig_str, which is legitimate. Every NCI
> function *must* have a signature in order to be able to determine how
> to map PCC to the native ABI. sig_str being null is *not* a valid
> state for this object, and the assertion is appropriate.

I would disagree, to a point. Obviously sig_str in invoke is an error
condition but the correct behavior is to throw an exception, not fail
an assertion.

--Andrew Whitworth
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev

Reply via email to