On Monday 31 January 2011 at 07:16, Will Coleda wrote: > I am not convinced that this is a problem. I certainly don't expect, > as a parrot developer, to actively work on these tools*, but find the > thought that supporting portability is harmful... strange.
Set aside the silly strawman that Parrot is actively hostile to cross-VM portability and we can have a rational discussion of the real issue: Portability is never free. In specific, supporting a cross-VM portability layer within Parrot's repository requires: * hosting an abstraction layer of code in addition to what NQP-rx provides today * which probably has runtime costs * which definitely has support costs in terms of our deprecation policy, our test policy, our documentation policy, and pretty much every policy we have regarding code intended for use by Parrot users * which very likely has implications on the interface between Parrot and the new NQP as the abstraction layer will necessarily change to support more backends * tolerating the concomitant churn of said layer * gathering the resources to design, implement, support, test, and maintain said layer I believe that that cross-language portability layer--no matter how valuable it may be as a philosophical, ethical, practical, or aesthetic goal--is, at best, irrelevant to Parrot's goals today. It's more likely an expensive distraction. Some, but not all, of these concerns are moot if the portability layer is completely external to Parrot itself and never included in Parrot's repository or the official Parrot packages. In particular, the concerns about a runtime performance penalty imposed by the abstraction layer as well as interface churn do not go away for two reasons: * it may penalize Parrot in sketchy competitive performance analysis (I can write a backend for a tiny subset of Perl 6 with mind-blowing performance because it doesn't do anything interesting, and all that proves is that features aren't free) * it may penalize core Parrot programs written in the language for no benefit Again, that portability may be a fine goal for the new NQP and it may be a fundamental goal to Rakudo and it may make you feel warm and fuzzy inside and it could be nice to pursue in a world without resource constraints, but it's a goal irrelevant to Parrot right now. -- c _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev