Howdy, Thanks so much for working on this, Andy!
The labels/tags look fine to me. I would say that if we could remove some of the basic Trac markup (like removing/replacing [BR]) and attempt to leave behind plain text, that would get us where we need to go. I expect that we will need some manual ticket massaging, but if your script can get us 90% of the way there, it is a success. > There is still much to do: > > * Add ticket history Do we really need this? What about just linking to the original TT? That seems like less work. > > * Add ticket ownership Do we need this? Perhaps we should let this be a "reset" where people can decide what tickets they want to assign themselves. I know that many TT's got assigned to me for various reasons but I really had no time or motivation to work on them. I assume the same holds for others. > * Convert the ticket text to Markdown it renders correctly. If this is easy, then go for it. I think just stripping out some of the basic Trac-isms would be enough. > * Add milestone Do we need this? As far as I know, we don't use milestones anymore, and they were always kind of a big lie we told ourselves and others. > * Maybe converter autocleanup headings like titles starting with "[RFC]" and > tag appropriately. Could be interesting, but also, we could leave that for the manual ticket massage stage. > PLEASE look at the tickets and let me know what you think. Are my > assumptions about labels correct? Are there gaping holes? It looks really awesome! Can't wait until we pull the plug on Trac. Duke -- Jonathan "Duke" Leto <[email protected]> Leto Labs LLC 209.691.DUKE // http://labs.leto.net NOTE: Personal email is only checked twice a day at 10am/2pm PST, please call/text for time-sensitive matters. _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
