Hmmm, how did I not realize there were people cleaning up the other lists? Last time I looked must have been on parrot-directors. Either way, it's probably not a bad idea to get a few more people looking at the lists anyway.
Also, the suggestions that we dump a few of the under-trafficed lists is a good one. Obviously if they don't get any traffic there's no effort to maintain them, but it's unnecessary. parrot-advisors and parrot-commits are fine to axe in my opinion. --Andrew Whitworth On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:13 PM, James E Keenan <jk...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 2/17/13 9:29 PM, Christoph Otto wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013, at 16:13, Andrew Whitworth wrote: >>> >>> I would like some volunteers to help with administering the various >>> parrot mailing lists. Currently I am the only one doing it, and I >>> think I'm not doing a great job. Having a second set of eyes on the >>> lists (or three, or four) would help in a lot of ways. >>> >>> It shouldn't be a lot of extra work (especially if we get a few people >>> to volunteer). If you're interested, please send me an email. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> --Andrew Whitworth >> >> >> I'm pretty sure I'm also one of the admins. I occasionally go in and >> clear out whatever's caught in the spam filter. If there's more to it >> that I can help out with, I'm glad to do so. >> >> Christoph > > > And I too am an admin on all lists (except parrot-directors). Some of these > lists should be shut down -- I can't recall ever seeing a posting to > parrot-advisors. Also, is anyone making use of the parrot-commits mailing > list? > > jimk > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
