Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's a start.
> Favoring the lighter-weight FILE* output function is not a big deal,
> but does tend to make the code smaller and a little more robust.
>
> BTW, I noticed some inconsistency in spacing before function-call
> open parentheses, e.g.
> printf (
I think this one is the right. Anyone disagree?
<...>
> - printf(_("\nCommand History:\n"));
> + fputs (_("\nCommand History:\n"), stdout);
<...>
Your proposed changes looks right but I do think we should provide a
method to make it easier?
For example the following code (I hadn't test this code)?
#v+
static void printp (...)
{
va_list va_args;
va_start (va_args);
fputs (va_args, stdout);
va_end (va_args);
}
#v-
Using it, we could then do:
#v+
- printf(_("\nCommand History:\n"));
+ printp (_("\nCommand History:\n"));
#v-
Comments?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
