"Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Is this the mechanism that will reject any patch that does not conform to >>> the coding standard? If yes, then fantastic. To augment it we can still > >> That's the goal. I don't know if it's attainable. >> It might be too draconian. > > It would save a lot of headache later on. If we have a clearly stated > coding style, then it is not too harsh. Then everybody knows how to > write what.
You're preaching to the choir. >> It might be nearly as good to have a way to check manually, >> e.g., "make check-indentation". Then there won't be the hook-related >> overhead (and complexity) of checking at every push. Think what happens >> when your carefully prepared, locally-committed patch cannot be pushed >> because of the hook. You'd have to redo it to get past the hook. > > Can't we have the hook on our local repositories as well? Sure, but that's up to the individual. Can't be mandated. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
