On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:01:45PM +0100, Joel Granados wrote:
> Well, I still see the use for the first version of the patch, the one that
> did not
Sure, the patch makes a lot of sense.
> Note that we are already stating and checking if they are S_IFBLK. This
> comes after we make sure that we are not looking for none paths. So
> when we find server mounts they *will* be ignored.
Yep.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <k...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
parted-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
