The server is a Fedora 14 system (obviously, the client is anything you
like)
I don't think the distro should make much of a difference, unless CentOS
ships a weird eclipse setup.
Does it work if you first launch a terminal then launch eclipse from there?
Anything in the logs?

Antoine

On 04/01/2011 07:46 PM, Paul G. Weiss wrote:
> On what distro are you running it?  I was trying on Centos 5.
> -P
> 
> 
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:55:37 -0400, Antoine Martin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> That's odd, I've just tried it and it seems to work fine.
>> I am using winswitch to start it, but that shouldn't make any
>> difference. (worth a try though)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Antoine
>>
>> On 04/01/2011 04:27 AM, Paul G. Weiss wrote:
>>> Is anyone able to run Eclipse under xpra.  I had tried earlier and
>>> failed and just tried again with this new release.  Still no good.  It
>>> brings up the initial splash screen then hangs.
>>>
>>> -P
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:44:05 -0400, Antoine Martin
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've just made a new release (0.0.7.18) at:
>>>> http://winswitch.org/dists/
>>>>
>>>> * DEBian packages for all major debian based distros
>>>> * RPMs for Fedora, CentOS and openSUSE
>>>> * ebuilds for Gentoo
>>>> * Standalone Xpra installer for MS Windows
>>>>
>>>> The only things I have not built are the Mac OS X DMGs but you can use
>>>> the winswitch DMGs for that (it includes xpra amongst other things)
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you have any problems.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Antoine
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/27/2011 01:36 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been making regular releases of an "enhanced xpra" here:
>>>>> http://winswitch.org/src/
>>>>> You can find debian packages on this site too. This is the version
>>>>> used
>>>>> by FreeBSD, amongst others. I have also made ebuilds for Gentoo and
>>>>> RPMs
>>>>> for a number of distributions.
>>>>> Please also note that "winswitch" (the software on this site) will not
>>>>> work with xpra upstream because it lacks some required features.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a short summary of the enhancements I added:
>>>>> * jpeg compression support (patch was not mine)
>>>>> * minor version mismatch support (only refuses clients connections
>>>>> when
>>>>> protocol has actually changed)
>>>>> * --password-file option (useful for securing --bind-tcp)
>>>>> * compile fix for Fedora (and maybe others)
>>>>> * python style fixes (from pydev lint warnings)
>>>>> * forced client disconnection (prevents ghost windows)
>>>>> * --no-pulseaudio option
>>>>> * --no-clipboard option
>>>>> * simple GUI launcher
>>>>> * win32 build files
>>>>> * better OSX support
>>>>> etc
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the keyboard mapping issues, I am aware of the problem and
>>>>> although winswitch does try to workaround the mapping issues this is a
>>>>> hard problem to solve and I have recently found new issues caused
>>>>> by the
>>>>> workarounds.. Time permitting, I will take another look at this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Antoine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/27/2011 12:29 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I sent this email to your email address last December, but I got no
>>>>>>   reply yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I was working on preparing a Debian package for parti-all (based on
>>>>>>   the Ubuntu package). Yet some concerns were raised on Debian
>>>>>> regarding
>>>>>>   the software:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   * You mentioned that parti is not usable as an actual day-to-day
>>>>>>     window manager.
>>>>>>   * xpra has problems with non-US keyboards layouts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I had a look at the hg repository, and I see there were a
>>>>>> considerable
>>>>>>   amount of changes since your last release (0.0.6), I wonder if the
>>>>>>   above issues got fixed then. Also, do you intend to prepare a new
>>>>>>   release soon ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Parti-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Parti-discuss mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Parti-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Parti-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Parti-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss


_______________________________________________
Parti-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss

Reply via email to