On 2015-03-02 22:42, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 00:32:05 -0500 Dylan Mikus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Has there been any thought into encrypting the actual directory tree > > so that no one would be able to view what accounts you have? Is that > > something people are interested in, or was there a conscious decision > > against it for design reasons? > > Encrypting the entire directory tree makes it a lot harder to process > things with plain UNIX tools if you for some reason don't want to or > can't use pass to access the store. > > Conversely, if you really think the minor metadata leak is a problem, > tar up and gpg-encrypt your $PASSWORD_STORE_DIR and write a wrapper for > pass that decrypts/untars it to /dev/shm and sets $PASSWORD_STORE_DIR > appropriately, then cleans up after itself.
Or use something like ecryptfs. -- Regards, Matthew Cengia
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
