Quoting Matthieu Weber (2016-01-26 16:59:40) > So symmetric encryption is actally used, and the problem of managing the > symmetric keys is already solved. What is there not to like about the > way pass works by default?
I did not mean to say that I do not like the way pass works. I did mean to say that I have no reason to like the -c option of GPG to be used in pass. And I think I will continue to use my private key with pass, I was just trying to do some thinking about this proposal. And I also know that asymmetric encryption with GPG uses symmetric encryption internally. But this is a technical detail (and maybe a security detail), my thought was about the use case and the interaction the user has to do with pass/gpg/pinentry/gpg-agent.
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
