On 7 February 2014 14:37, Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:06:39PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> Am 06.02.2014 23:49 schrieb Markus Mayer: >> > Make sure we don't attempt to search for a patch in a reply e-mail. >> > There are MUAs out there who leave the quoted e-mail intact without >> > prepending quote characters such as ">" at the beginning of each line. >> > >> > When that happens, parse_patch() thinks the quoted patch is new. The >> > result are multiple database entries containing the same patch (one for >> > each such reply) when one would really expect a consolidated thread >> > containing the entire discussion and only one copy of the patch. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <[email protected]> >> >> AFAICS this will cause loss of patches which are sent as replies. > > +1. This approach will cause more pain than gain. Move those users away > from Outlook, would be my recommendation.
Have you ever worked for a 10,000+ employee organization? And no, I don't particularly like this solution, either. But I couldn't come up with a better one. -Markus _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
