Dear Jeremy Kerr,

On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:18:19 +1000, Jeremy Kerr wrote:

> > Another thing that is missing IMO is a way of sorting the patches by
> > the number of A/R/T tags. Probably not needed to be able to sort them
> > for each individual value, but being able to sort them by the sum of
> > A+R+T would be useful so that maintainers can spot immediately which
> > patches have received Acked-by, Tested-by or Reviewed-by tags.
> 
> The part I'm working on at the moment is a facility to filter the patch
> list by the presence of each tag type (eg, only show patches with at
> least one ack).
> 
> Would that suit? Or do you actually want to prioritise patches by the
> number of acks/reviews/tests? Or rather than a boolean "presence of a
> tag" filter, how about a "has N or more" type filter?

All I was thinking of is really simple: adding the same small greenish
arrow that you use for Date sorting to do A/R/T sorting.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
Patchwork mailing list
Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork

Reply via email to