Em Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:42:21 +0800 Jeremy Kerr <j...@ozlabs.org> escreveu:
> Hi all, > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:35:11PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > >> I'd like to be able to assign reviewers to patches. That seems very > >> close to what a delegate is today. Would anyone have objections if I > >> just use Delegate as Reviewer? > > > > I'm honestly not sure what Delegate is intended for. It seems like its > > purpose is open to your interpretation. > > One example: on the powerpc list, we have an overall maintainer, and > several sub-maintainers, who are generally responsible for their own > subsystem or set of hardware. > > If a patch for one of the sub-maintiners' areas appears, it can be > delegated to the appropriate person to review, test, and/or merge. The > change is then included in the next merge-request from the > sub-maintainer to the main maintainer. We do the same at the media subsystem. Laurent even wrote some patches for patchwork to do patch auto-delegation based on the paths inside the diffstat, using regex expressions. Not sure if he sent those patches upstream. > > In this case, patch review is only one of the tasks of the delegate. > > Cheers, > > > Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > Patchwork mailing list > Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork