Stephen Finucane <step...@that.guru> writes:
> On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:24 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>> The fuzz fixups made the test too strict ("if not subject" rather than
>> "if subject is None") in an attempt to catch broken subject headers.
>> This broke parsing of messages with an empty subject.
>>
>> Fix it and add a test.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net>
>
> Is a mail with an empty subject really valid for our use cases?
You can get a valid patch with an empty subject. It's dumb and people
shouldn't do it, but it is not broken per se.
Regards,
Daniel
>
> Stephen
_______________________________________________
Patchwork mailing list
Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
