On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:46 +0000, Benjamin Copeland wrote: > Hi All, > > Been trying to get a patch but been unable due to: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "pwclient", line 827, in <module> > main() > File "pwclient", line 780, in main > action_get(rpc, patch_id) > File "pwclient", line 301, in action_get > s = rpc.patch_get_mbox(patch_id) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/xmlrpclib.py", line 1243, in __call__ > return self.__send(self.__name, args) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/xmlrpclib.py", line 1602, in __request > verbose=self.__verbose > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/xmlrpclib.py", line 1283, in request > return self.single_request(host, handler, request_body, verbose) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/xmlrpclib.py", line 1316, in > single_request > return self.parse_response(response) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/xmlrpclib.py", line 1487, in > parse_response > p.feed(data) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/xmlrpclib.py", line 558, in feed > self._parser.Parse(data, 0) > xml.parsers.expat.ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line > 283, column 1 > > After going quite a bit of debugging I noticed the patch has a ^L > (FF) in the diff. After deleting this out of the diff pwclient was > able to get the patch. > > This bug was present on Python3/2.
Have you got a link to the offending patch? This will allow me to fix the issue and put together a fix to prevent regressions. Stephen _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
