On 12/11/19 9:27 am, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
Existing regex was missing several important use cases, such as:

- tag/branch info wrapping to the next line, e.g.:

----
are available in the Git repository at:

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/
tags/v5.4-next-soc

----
(see example: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11236893/)

- tag/branch info being wrapped to the next line with a backslash, e.g.:

----
are available in the Git repository at:

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/ \
   tags/v5.4-next-soc

----
(no example, but I've seen this before)

The proposed change deals with these edge-cases.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]>

This needs a test :) Should be as simple as adding the examples you link to in patchwork/tests/mail, and then adding a couple of one-line test cases in PatchParseTest in patchwork/tests/test_parser.py.

---
  patchwork/parser.py | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/patchwork/parser.py b/patchwork/parser.py
index c794f09..d25c0df 100644
--- a/patchwork/parser.py
+++ b/patchwork/parser.py
@@ -939,11 +939,11 @@ def parse_patch(content):
  def parse_pull_request(content):
      git_re = re.compile(r'^The following changes since commit.*'
                          r'^are available in the git repository at:\n'
-                        r'^\s*([\S]+://[^\n]+)$',
+                        
r'^\s*([\w+-]+(?:://|@)[\w/.@:~-]+[\s\\]*[\w/._-]*)\s*$',
                          re.DOTALL | re.MULTILINE | re.IGNORECASE)
      match = git_re.search(content)
      if match:
-        return match.group(1)
+        return re.sub('\s+', ' ', match.group(1)).strip()
      return None
base-commit: 239fbd2ca1bf140bc61fdee922944624b23c812c


--
Andrew Donnellan              OzLabs, ADL Canberra
[email protected]             IBM Australia Limited

_______________________________________________
Patchwork mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork

Reply via email to