On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 16:00 +0000, Stephen Finucane wrote: > This reduces a lot of the tech debt we had built up around this. This > field is populated from a slugified representation of State.name and has > a uniqueness constraint. As a result, we also need to a uniqueness > constraint to the State.name field. This shouldn't be an issue and > probably should have been used from day one. > > Note that there is no REST API impact for this since we've been using > state slugs all along. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <step...@that.guru>
Applied. _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
