I am also not opposed to the suggestion. The only 'con' I can see is the added length for internationalization, but that is probably something we can deal with. Mary
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Serena Doyle <[email protected]> wrote: > Matthew, > > I wouldn't be opposed to that, I think we actually had it in some of our > product mocks originally. Can anyone think of any cons? > > Thanks, > - Serena > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Matthew Stevens <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I would like to make the following recommendation concerning PTNFLY-1831 >> <https://patternfly.atlassian.net/browse/PTNFLY-1831>: >> >> *Show Advanced Options / Hide Advanced Options* >> >> Currently, the label is always *Advanced Options*. Adding "Show" when >> the options are hidden and "Hide" when they are displayed is clearer and >> makes the action more explicit. >> >> Please let me know what you think. >> >> Thank you, >> Matthew Stevens >> > > > > -- > - Serena Chechile Doyle > *UXD | Unified Management Experience* > *Red Hat* > *Cell* 508-769-7715 | *IRC* - serena | *Skype* - serenamarie125 | > *Twitter* - @serenamarie125 > -- *Mary Clarke* Principal Interaction Designer [email protected] | 919.244.5040 | Raleigh, NC
_______________________________________________ Patternfly mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly
