I wrote:
> Instead of equating them with **relationships** among these things.
Well, in all truth, the above is too restrictive. How come,
no one gripped :-) ?
It is probably closer to relationships among software
things and/or human things, and/or time, and/or ...
any other relevant things; that have the special characteristic
to be a "solution to a problem in a context that balances some
forces", that are part of a pattern language, that describe
a thing and a process to create this thing, that contribute
to the comfort of the people using and developing the
software, etc.
- Mike
"I self-organize therefore I am."
- Mike Beedle
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion
