John Sawyer wrote:
> The $1200 a year difference is probably quite significant for some people.

The Nessus home feed is free for home users.  So, depends your budget
and type/size of your organization.

> Since most of these checks are a result of the Conficker Working Group,
> I would suspect their mostly all the same minus some minor adjustments
> for the idiosyncrasies of each tool.

Agreed.

Paul


> 
> -jhs
> 
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Paul Asadoorian wrote:
> 
>> Not certain, but you could compare the NASL and the NSE to see.  Nessus
>> may just be easier for some if you don't have the SVN version of Nmap
>> already installed in your environment.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Paul
>>
>> Albert R. Campa wrote:
>>> interesting, so not having looked at this yet, whats the difference
>>> between that and scanning with Nessus?
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________
>>> Albert R. Campa
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/3/30 John Sawyer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>
>>>    The Conficker check is in the latest SVN version of Nmap. It's in
>>>    the smb-check-vulns.nse which now checks for Conficker, MS08-067 and
>>>    a regsvc DoS.
>>>
>>>    nmap --script smb-check-vulns.nse -p445
>>>
>>>    For safety's sake, you might want to also run it with
>>>    --script-args=unsafe=1 to prevent possible crashes from the regsvc
>>>    check. That should not turn off the conficker check.
>>>
>>>    -jhs
>>>
>>>    On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Chris Merkel wrote:
>>>
>>>>    According to this:
>>>>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/30/conficker_signature_discovery/
>>>>
>>>>    A script should be released today to scan for conficker-infected
>>>>    machines over the wire.
>>>>
>>>>    I looked at the NSE portal and haven't seen anything yet - would it
>>>>    show up there, or is there a development site or repository where
>>>> this
>>>>    will first appear?
>>>>
>>>>    I'd like to get a scan in before April 1st, when variant C drops.
>>>>
>>>>    --
>>>>    - Chris Merkel
>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>    Pauldotcom mailing list
>>>>    [email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>    http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>>>>    Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com <http://pauldotcom.com/>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    Pauldotcom mailing list
>>>    [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>    http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>>>    Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com <http://pauldotcom.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pauldotcom mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>>
>> -- 
>> Paul Asadoorian
>> PaulDotCom Enterprises
>> Web: http://pauldotcom.com
>> Phone: 401.829.9552
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

-- 
Paul Asadoorian
PaulDotCom Enterprises
Web: http://pauldotcom.com
Phone: 401.829.9552
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to