"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher
a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts,
build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders,
cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure,
program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.
Specialization is for insects."

~Robert A. Heinlein

That said, from a career stand point I have no idea, I just love Heinlein.
:)

Adrian


On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:42 PM, John Navarro <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree, it depends. I've spent the last 10 years specializing in firewalls
> and it was an ok gig, but it stops being challenging or interesting
> eventually (depending on where you work and the responsibilities) . Now I've
> done a LOT of other things, and been involved in a lot of other aspects of
> security, but it was hard to break away from that "firewall guy" mentality.
> If you're specialized, sometimes managers will only see you as capable of
> doing that one thing, and will try to keep you in that role because they
> feel nobody else can fill it. At least that's been my experience...but now I
> do forensic analysis of devorak keyboards for AS/400 systems
> emulating Apple IIc systems! (j/k)
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Michael Douglas <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> It all depends on what sort of a career you want to have.  If you want
>> to find a job pretty easily and have a great variety in what your
>> day-to-day gig looks like, I think being a generalist is a valid
>> option.  However, if you have the inclination and want to focus on
>> just one aspect of InfoSec you can do that too.  Be sure to checkout
>> what your local market will pay for each.  Sometimes specializing can
>> be very lucrative, unless perhaps you're focusing on something too
>> niche (forensic analysis of devorak keyboards for AS/400 systems
>> emulating Apple IIc systems).
>>
>> Also remember, it's only money... you should view your time as far
>> more important.  If you don't believe in your job and really enjoy or
>> find what you're doing interesting, you do need to start looking
>> elsewhere.  Do NOT become a cow-orker. We (geeks) make very poor
>> sheeple.
>>
>> <rant>
>> If you really want to get me frothy in the mouth start saying stuff
>> like  "jack of all trades, master of none".  Why? It's a LIE.
>> Assuming no cognitive impermanent or organic brain damage, one can
>> become really good at any number of computer based skills.  I honestly
>> believe the idea that someone HAS to focus on just one thing is a
>> misguided "truth" perpetuated by those who are lacking skills
>> themselves.  (also bear in mind two things -- first I'm not professing
>> to be a general know-it-all for computer stuff.  Second, I've had too
>> much caffeine. Again.  So this answer should be read as 30% less
>> ranty)
>> </rant>
>>
>> Maybe we should have an InfoSec career round-table on the show
>> sometime soon.  Any votes on this?  If you like the idea, please send
>> some questions our way!
>>
>> - Mick
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Robert
>> Portvliet<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > What do you guys think of this article?
>> >
>> > http://darkreading.com/blog/archives/2009/08/specialization.html
>> >
>> > Do you feel it's better to study different areas of infosec (incident
>> > handling AND penetration testing, for instance) or do you think it's
>> > best to pick one area & focus all your efforts on learning everything
>> > you can about it?
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pauldotcom mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to