If I had to guess, Adrian, I'd say your work has come to be the bane of a very angry Swedish script kiddie who can't get his 'sploit to work anymore....
I could be wrong, but I've never heard such vitriol from anyone who I'd consider to be a security professional. On Dec 30, 2009 2:17 PM, "Nicholas B." <[email protected]> wrote: There is something to be said for having people that are allowed to comment on postings you use be required to verify an email at least and allow it to be posted at the moderators discretion to curb some of these trolling comments. Trolls will learn (sometimes) that if other readers are able to respond to them directly rather than just by populating a comments thread they may want to think twice about doing so the next time. Aside from that step I agree with everyone else on ignoring them being the only real avenue for dealing with that kind of abuse. BTW your videos are excellent and it is often much easier to understand what you've recorded than a README that the author threw together for something that they know well because they created the project/tool/program, but an end user is starting from scratch with. I appreciate your work and would hate to see something like that discourage you in the least. On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Adrian Crenshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for all of...
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
