Credentialed scanning.

I have been having a discussion with some fellas about MS10-002 and
MS09-072 and some vuln reports to be specific.



__________________________________
Albert R. Campa



On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Paul Asadoorian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Albert,
>
> Are you doing credentialed scanning or network-based scanning?
>
>
> On 2/17/10 2:17 PM, Albert R. Campa wrote:
>> What do you guys think of scanning and reporting of cumulative 
>> vulnerabilities?
>>
>> For example. If you have vulnerability A that supercedes vulnerability
>> B. Nessus will report both A and B as vulnerable, but for patching
>> only Vulnerability A needs to be patched. So why report vulnerability
>> B? Should the scanner ingore superceded vulnerabilities? Is the only
>> plus to reporting both A and B is to have a history of old
>> vulnerabilities not patched?
>>
>> What about metrics? A and B might be vulnerable but only patch A needs
>> to be installed.
>>
>>
>> If an admin gets a vuln report with both A and B, can they easily
>> figure out oh, this is cumulative, so I only need to install A, or are
>> they going to try to install both.
>>
>>
>> want to get more opinions on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Albert R. Campa
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
> --
> Paul Asadoorian
> PaulDotCom Enterprises
> Web: http://pauldotcom.com
> Phone: 401.829.9552
>
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to