I would see if McAfee has audit capabilities, such as FDCC or CIS, MS, etc hardening audit capabilities, like Nessus does.
__________________________________ Albert R. Campa On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:21 PM, John Strand <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow... > > Talk about coming to the right place. > > First, look at credentialed scans. Not only can they look for > vulnerabilites, but they check configuration compliance. > > Now I play the "Summon Paul +5" card. > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, subzer0girl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I need a little help convincing the purchasing people that I need Nessus. >> They are suggesting McAfee Vulnerability Management is a viable >> alternative. I want to stick with Nessus since that is what I have >> experience with. I've googled for a comparison of the two products but >> haven't found anything of value. Does anyone have experience with how the >> two products compare ? >> >> Any help would be appreciated >> >> Sandy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pauldotcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom >> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Pauldotcom mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com > _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
