Given the burst of activity over the last few weeks and the editors' intention to get their document in shape for WGLC soon, I'm no longer concerned. :) Good progress!
On 1/11/12 5:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I wanted to give folks some time to prepare what they committed for in the > last f2f, but maybe this is a little too much time as it is perceived as > inactivity. > Anyway, I'll send a reminder of what we need to do tomorrow, then we take it > from there. > > - Gabor > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext > Peter Saint-Andre > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [paws] WG activity > > <hat type='AD'/> > > It's been almost two months since the last message was posted to this list. > Has interest waned? Are there open issues with the use cases and > requirements? If not, is it time to start working on the protocol? > > Please note that the deadline for requesting a WG session at IETF 83 in Paris > is January 30. It would be good to get a sense of agenda topics before then, > so discussion is very much encouraged. > > Thanks! > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > http://stpeter.im/ > > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
