Gerald, Andy, Thank you for these comments. I will include these changes in version 03.
Kind Regards, Scott On 1/30/12 10:55 AM, "ext [email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: >Scott > >Agreed these are good changes. Also, last paragraph of the conclusion, >"... and also shows an examples of a services provided ....", delete both >"an" and "a". In the references, there is a shorter link to [Ofcom >Implementing] : >http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/geolocation/statement/ > >Regards > >Andy > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >[email protected] >Sent: 30 January 2012 15:27 >To: [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [paws] Use cases and requirements: sections 9 and 11 >(Summary and Conclusion, References) > >Hi Scott, all, > >Here are some suggested changes to the text: > >- 7th line of section 9: change "secondary" for "opportunistic". In the >ITU-R Table of frequency allotment, there are bands where primary and >secondary services already exist. White Space opportunistic use would >then become some sort of tertiary service usage. > >- Penultimate sentence of section 9: add a coma as follows: "From these >use cases, requirements are determined." > >- Section 11, first reference: >(802.11p) ... > >- Section 11, add a new second reference: >(802.22) IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information technology - > Telecommunications and information exchange between > systems - Wireless Regional Area Networks (WRAN) - Specific > requirements; Part 22: Cognitive Wireless RAN Medium Access > Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: >Policies > and Procedures for Operation in the TV bands; http:// > standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.22-2011.pdf", > July 2011. > >Regards, > >Gerald > > >Quoting [email protected]: > >> Hello All, >> >> As editors of the problem statement, use cases & requirements draft we >> are attempting to prepare a completed draft which could be ready for >> working group last call before IETF83. In the coming days we will post >> the sections of the draft to the mailing list. Our request is that you >> review these sections and reply to the email with any comments. >> >> Below is the text for sections 9 and 11. This text has not changed >> from >> version-02 as uploaded January 26, 2012. Our goal is that any >> discussion on this text will conclude by February 6. To be clear, >> approval of the document will go through the normal process of last >> calls etc.. We are simply asking for your assistance in preparing a >> complete & accurate document that could progress the work. So please >> review the text and send your comments either directly to the editor or >>to the mailing list. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Raj & Scott >> >> >> >> 9. Summary and Conclusion >> >> Wireless spectrum is a scarce resource. As the demand for spectrum >> grows, there is a need to more efficiently utilize the available and >> allocated spectrum. Cognitive radio technologies enable the >> efficient usage of spectrum via means such as sensing or by querying >> a database to determine available spectrum at a given location for >> secondary use. White space is the general term used to refer to the >> bands within the spectrum which is available for secondary use at a >> given location. In order to use this spectrum a device needs to >> query a database which maintains information about the available >> channels within a band. A protocol is necessary for communication >> between the devices and databases which would be globally applicable. >> >> The document describes some examples of the role of the white space >> database in the operation of a radio network and also shows an >> examples of a services provided to the user of a TVWS device. From >> these use cases requirements are determined. These requirements are >> to be used as input to the definition of a Protocol to Access White >> Space database (PAWS). >> >> >> >> 11. References >> >> 11.1. Normative References >> >> [80211P] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information technology - >> Telecommunications and information exchange between >> systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific >> requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control >> (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications; Amendment >> 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments; http:// >> standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11p-2010.pdf", >> July 2010. >> >> [FCC47CFR90.210] >> FCC, "Title 47 Telecommunication CFR Chapter I - Federal >> Communication Commission Part 90 - Private Land Mobile >> Radio Services - Section 210 Emission masks; http:// >> edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2010/octqtr/pdf/ >> 47cfr90.210.pdf", October 2010. >> >> [PAWS-PS] IETF, "Protocol to Access White Space database: Problem >> statement; https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ >> draft-patil-paws-problem-stmt/", July 2011. >> >> [RFC2119] IETF, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement >> Levels; >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc2119.txt.pdf";, >> March 1997. >> >> 11.2. Informative References >> >> [DDR] Ofcom - Independent regulator and competition authority >> for the UK communications industries, "Digital Dividend >> Review; http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/spectrum/ >> project-pages/ddr/". >> >> [DTV] "Digital TV Transition; http://www.dtv.gov";. >> >> [ECC Report 159] >> Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the >> European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications >> Administrations (CEPT), "TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL >> REQUIREMENTS FOR THE POSSIBLE OPERATION OF COGNITIVE RADIO >> SYSTEMS IN THE 'WHITE SPACES' OF THE FREQUENCY BAND 470- >> 590 MHZ; http://www.erodocdb.dk/Docs/doc98/official/pdf/ >> ECCREP159.PDF", January 2011. >> >> [FCC Ruling] >> >> >> >> Probasco & Patil Expires July 18, 2012 [Page 32] >> >> Internet-Draft PAWS: Problem, uses and requirements January 2012 >> >> >> FCC, "Federal Communications Commission, "Unlicensed >> Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands; >> http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-30184.pdf"";, >> December 2010. >> >> [Ofcom Implementing] >> Ofcom, "Ofcom, "Implementing Geolocation; http:// >> stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/geolocation/ >> statement/ >> ?utm_source=updates&utm_medium=email& >> utm_campaign=geolocation-statement"", September 2011. >> >> [RFC5222] IETF, Hardie, T., Netwon, A., Schulzrinne, H., and H. >> Tschofenig, "LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Proto >> col;http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc5222.txt.pdf";, >> August 2008. >> >> [Spectrum Framework Review] >> Ofcom - Independent regulator and competition authority >> for the UK communications industries, "Spectrum Framework >> Review; >> http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/sfr/";, >> February 2005. >> >> [TV Whitespace Tutorial Intro] >> IEEE 802 Executive Committee Study Group on TV White >> Spaces, "TV Whitespace Tutorial Intro; http:// >> grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/802_tutorials/2009-03/ >> 2009-03-10%20TV%20Whitespace%20Tutorial%20r0.pdf", >> March 2009. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> paws mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws >> > > > >_______________________________________________ >paws mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
