Hello Don, Thank you for providing this analysis. It is very good to know that our progress thus far is well aligned with a working and certified database.
I propose that we change O.22 as follows: O.22: A Master device MUST include its identity in messages sent to the database. Kind Regards, Scott On 2/27/12 3:40 PM, "ext Don Joslyn" <[email protected]> wrote: >Spectrum Bridge offers the following feedback to the latest PAWS >Requirements posted by Scott Probasco on 2/21/12, UC&R I-D Requirements - >Section 6 revisions of the I-D which describes the Data Model, Protocol >and Operational Requirements: > >We reviewed the latest PAWS requirements, comparing them to the published >FCC requirements that established the requirements used by Spectrum >Bridge to implement its certified TVWS database. We believe that the >currently written PAWS Data Model, Protocol and Operational requirements >align well with our current FCC certified implementation (see attached >spreadsheet), and thus we support the PAWS requirements as written in the >2/21/22 from Scott Probasco, with a single exception, O.22. We do not >agree with O.22 because we believe that a device should ALWAYS include >its unique identity in messages sent to the database. > >Regards, > >Don Joslyn >Spectrum Bridge, Inc. _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
