All I believe that the WG draft has an omission in P.11 relating to the parameters that MAY be sent from the master device to the database. The data model in D.1 allows for location uncertainty, height and height uncertainty. These items are not mentioned in the parameters in P.11, and all (except height uncertainty) are required by Ofcom in http://www.cept.org/Documents/se-43/4161/SE43(12)Info03_Draft-UK-regulatory-requirements-for-white-space-devices-in-the-UHF-TV-band. I propose the following change:
P.11: The protocol MUST support a channel query request from the master device to the database. The channel query request message MUST include parameters as required by local regulatory requirement. These parameters MAY include device location, <Insert>location uncertainty, device height, height uncertainty, </Insert>device ID, manufacturer's serial number, and antenna characteristic information. Regards Andy From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 05 March 2012 19:46 To: [email protected] Subject: [paws] WGLC for draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-03 The authors of the use cases and requirements draft have just posted a new version of the draft and indicated that there are no unresolved comments/issues they are aware of. Therefore, I'd like to initiate a WG Last Call for comments on http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-03.txt Please review the draft and send your comments to the list by March 20th, 2012. If you review the draft and have no comments, send a note to the list that the draft is good as it is, we need these notes as much as we need the actual comments. Thanks, Gabor
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
