Op 25 sep. 2012, om 19:41 heeft <[email protected]> <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:
> I scanned through the data which has to be carried by PAWS, and it looks to > me that there are two RFCs which we may consider re-using: RFC5491 defines > the xml encoding for geo-location, I did not find a JSON encoding for it. The > other one is vCard, RFC6350. There is a so called xCard, RFC6351, the xml > representation of vCard, but again, I have not found a JSON encoding for > vCard. vCard seems to be able to handle contact information, schedule, etc, > but there are obviously other data fields, like antenna parameters, which > need to be defined in PAWS. > > First, I’d like to get some opinions on whether the reuse of the data > structures defined in the above two RFCs is generally considered a good idea > or not. If we want to reuse them, we’ll need to define a JSON encoding for > those. The alternative is to define the whole data structure with JSON > encoding in PAWS. I prefer to use current encoding as much as possible, with as a goal a clean and straightforward data structure. With compact messages in mind. Teco > > I’d like to hear opinions on which way is more feasible. > > - Gabor > > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
