Agreed.
We need to be able to resolve AGL, HAAT, location and maybe other criteria
based on the regulators methods. I am not sure a single 3D location will
be acceptable.

On ThuOct/11/12 Thu Oct 11, 6:07 AM, "Rosen, Brian"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>We need both I think, because of the way the regulations are written.  I
>don't think there is a simple way to convert that would be acceptable.
>In theory, if we knew the terrain height at the location accurately
>enough, we could calculate what we need, but that is an onerous
>requirement I think.
>
>Brian
> 
>On Oct 11, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Vincent Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>> 
>> The various versions of the proposed drafts of the PAWS protocol tended
>>to distinguish between "device location" and "antenna height".
>> 
>> I think we should combine them into a single 3-D location of the
>>radiation center of (the antenna of) the device.
>> 
>> Does that sound right?
>> 
>> The proposed draft-vchen-paws-protocol-00 defines the following
>>parameters for location and height:
>> 
>>   latitude
>>   longitude
>>   locationUncertainty
>>   locationConfidence
>> 
>>   height
>>   heightType
>>   heightUncertainty
>> 
>> This is very close to the fields  defined by RFC 6225, which has the
>>parameters:
>> 
>>  latitude
>>  latitudeUncertainty
>>  longitude
>>  longitudeUncertainty
>>  altitude
>>  altitudeUncertainty
>>  altitudeType
>> 
>> Should PAWS reference RFC 6225 and list the following differences?
>> 
>>  - The "altitudeType" should be "above means sea level" (WGS84) or
>>"above ground", instead of the ones defined in the RFC.
>> 
>>  - Add confidence values along each axis.
>> 
>> If this acceptable, then we can think about defining JSON encoding of
>>RFC 6225 for use by PAWS.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> -- 
>> -vince
>> _______________________________________________
>> paws mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
>
>_______________________________________________
>paws mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to