Hi Nancy, Thanks for your kind reminding;-) I have noticed that a lengthy discussion on the list and at Vancouver on the security issues. We are not aimed to rewrite the common agreement that WG has got.
The previous version of our draft is focused on the authentication and authorization model, for example, the interaction of master device, database and FCC. But the latest version simplifies the models, which provides a solution that “How database can validate a FCC approved master device”, etc. It could naturally solve the ID/device revocation problem. Also, since PSK auth is left out with a concern that IESG may refuse it without the key provision mechanism, we could try to provide PSK authentication with proper key provision mechanism. All in all, this submission is to discuss the possible threats and solutions not included in the current WG doc. Thanks, Yang ================== Yang Cui, Ph.D. Huawei Technologies [email protected] 发件人: Nancy Bravin [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2012年10月25日 7:39 收件人: Cuiyang 抄送: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta Hi Yang, It seems to me that when advocating issues that have been agreed upon otherwise before, at this late date, will need a formal proposal before any adoption takes place so the members have time to go through your presentation and again be able to respond via the reflector. Case in point…certificates/TLS…my recollection is that many discussed this for a long time and it was not excepted in the proposal. What is the thought process for changing this now and can you elaborate on why each area of change, needed or already decided against is in your presentation asap so there can be a proper proposal timeframe with members able to give such ideas its due time and questions on the PAWS reflector starting now, it may be of help to all of us, and in some cases be a help to the total effort. Thanks, Nancy On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Cuiyang wrote: Hi, Gabor and Brian We would like to ask for a time slot for introducing our draft-wu-paws-secutity-01. Thanks, Yang ================== Yang Cui, Ph.D. Huawei Technologies [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ================== Yang Cui, Ph.D. Huawei Technologies [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 发件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 发送时间: 2012年10月24日 5:32 收件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 主题: Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta If you would like a timeslot to present in the upcoming F2F, please send a request to the chairs. Thanks, Gabor From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bajko Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley) Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:51 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta Folks, FYI, I just requested a 2.5 hour session for PAWS at the Atlanta meeting. - Gabor _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
