We had good technical discussions during our last F2F, with good proposals on how to close some of the open issues. I'll try to summarize the outcome in the next couple of emails, starting with the least controversial items:
There were no objections against Vince's proposal to use JSON-RPC, as indicated in slides 7&8 of http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-paws-1.pptx Keeping the PAWS and HTTP layers separate and Indicating errors as proposed in slide 9 of http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-paws-1.pptx Use RFC5491 for geo-location encoding (someone needs to JSON encode it), instead of RFC6225, to support requirement D8. Use vCard encoding for the contact field (slide 18 of http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-paws-1.pptx ) I'd like to confirm these on the list. If you see any issues with the above, please notify the list asap. Thanks, Gabor
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
