On 3/21/13 3:56 PM, [email protected] wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-paws
Small updates regarding OFCOM: It shouldn't look like OFCOM was
participating in some official liaison-like capacity. That isn't how
things work in the IETF meetings. So:
OLD
Chair reviewed the agenda; one remote participant: OFCOM -- Cesar --
will provide a status update.
NEW
Chair reviewed the agenda; one remote participant: Cesar -- will provide
a status update on OFCOM.
OLD
First time for Ofcom participation in PAWS
NEW
First time for Cesar to participate in IETF
OLD
Request -- Ofcom to review current use case document.
NEW
Request -- Cesar to review current use case document.
OLD
Ofcom: would have a website that will have list of all websites of the
DB providers.
NEW
Andy: OFCOM was planning to have a website that will have list of all
websites of the DB providers.
---
I haven't done a scrub of the rest of the minutes, but on first glance
they look fine. (Thanks Dorothy.)
Other WG participants: Please review the minutes to make sure everything
was captured correctly. The minutes taker and the chairs should not have
*all* of the responsibility.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
