On 18 Sep 2013, at 22:01, Andy Lee <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
lots of interesting stuff... :) Andy, your examples are good. If the FCC regime folks want to specify channel edge emission masks that's OK with me, so long as it doesn't prohibit the ETSI approach at the same time. However on this particular point: Not having looked at Ofcom's data set yet, I think it's a little premature to say that they will be silent or explicitly omit data for channel 38. I must disagree. As mentioned last week, OFCOM have specifically said in their most recent consultation document in ยง5.93: "Consequently, given the risk of harmful interference and the very stringent emission limits, we believe it would be prudent not to allow WSD operation in channel 38". which we read as a very strong steer that they expect the WSD to specify (by omission, since that's the ETSI model) 0W (-Inf dBm) EIRP on channel 38. kind regards, Ray
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
